QUICK LOOK RESEARCH

Problem

When analyzing the New York Times reading experience, I focused on the friction points readers encounter before fully committing to an article. Through heuristic evaluation and quick user interviews, I noticed:

• Many readers felt overwhelmed by long article layouts and subscription prompts.

• There was no lightweight way to preview whether an article was worth their time.

• On mobile, constant page loads created interruptions in the browsing flow.

​

​

I decided to observe how other readers interacted with NYT content.

​

​

Early Observations

I sat with a test group and asked them to browse the homepage of the NYT as they normally would. Within minutes, I noticed a pattern:

They would open multiple tabs to “skim later” because there was no way to quickly judge an article’s value.

A couple of them even sighed when subscription prompts or long loading times broke their flow.

On mobile, people often scrolled back to the homepage instead of finishing an article,  signaling that commitment was too high up front.

It was clear that the issue wasn’t just personal , it was systemic to

​

how NYT structures its browsing experience.

​

User Conversations

To go deeper, I ran a handful of informal interviews (5 readers, ages 22–45). I asked them to walk me through their news-reading habits. What stood out:

​

• “Sometimes the headline is vague. I just want to peek inside first.”

• “I’m usually on the go. I need to scan, not commit.”

• “Other apps give me snippets. With NYT, I’m stuck clicking in and out.”

• These comments echoed my own frustrations, but more importantly, they revealed a clear unmet need for lightweight previews in the NYT interface.

​

Competitive Benchmarking

I compared NYT to other content platforms:

• Medium offers a seamless preview of an article:

Preview Availability: Yes, first few paragraphs visible.
Distraction-Free Reading: High , clean design, minimal UI.
Speed of Access: Fast skim.

​

• Apple News uses card-based previews for quick skimming:

Preview Availability: Yes, snippet plus image on cards.
Distraction-Free Reading: High, clean, compact card layout.
Speed of Access: Instant glance.

​

• Twitter/X encourages scanning headlines + snippets without committing to a page.

Preview Availability: Yes, headline and excerpt via tweet cards.
Distraction-Free Reading: Mixed, includes comments.
Speed of Access: Very fast.

​

This showed a gap: while NYT is strong in credibility and depth, its UX doesn’t support readers who want to skim quickly before diving deeper. While they do offer a snippet of info like the title and occasional images/sentences,

it does not offer a way to deeper info without going into the article. 

​

​

Contextual Inquiry
I began with contextual observations of how people consume news on the New York Times compared to other platforms. By shadowing readers during their daily routines (morning coffee, commuting, quick breaks), I noticed patterns:

​

• Mobile readers skim first, commit later. They bounce frequently if an article doesn’t hook them in the first 10 seconds.

​

• Desktop readers open multiple tabs. This behavior suggested the lack of a lightweight preview, forcing people to batch-open articles for later.

​

• Subscription prompts felt intrusive. Users described them as “a wall” rather than an invitation, which discouraged exploration.

​​

Quantitative Indicators

Although I didn’t have access to NYT’s internal analytics, I reviewed public data and usability studies on news consumption:

​

• The average session time on news sites is ~2 minutes, with many users only scanning headlines.

​

• Bounce rates on news articles can exceed 40%, often because the headline did not match user expectations.

​

• Research from the Reuters Institute shows that over 70% of users prefer a quick skim or summary before deciding to read in full.

​

These numbers reinforced my qualitative insights:

the NYT risks losing readers in the crucial “skim-to-commit” moment.

​

Personas & Needs

From interviews and observations, I distilled two lightweight personas:

​

The Commuter (age 25–35)

• Reads headlines during subway rides.

• Needs to scan content quickly in a “stop-and-go” environment.

• Frustrated by page reloads and intrusive prompts.

​

The Researcher (age 35–50)

• Consumes multiple articles for work or study.

• Wants to preview depth before committing to full reading.

• Prefers clarity and efficiency over visual flair.

​

Both personas highlight the gap between headlines and full content, a preview feature directly addresses this.

​

 Pain Points Summarized

• Cognitive Load: Users can’t easily judge relevance from headline + image alone.

• Time Constraints: Slow loads and full-page commitments don’t fit into fragmented reading habits.

​

Research Conclusion

Through observations, quick interviews, secondary data, and competitive mapping, I confirmed a recurring need:

​

readers crave a middle step between headline and full article.

The Reader Mode Preview concept emerged not as a nice-to-have, but as a clear opportunity to reduce friction, improve retention, and align NYT with modern reading habits.